TreeFlow - Rio Grande at Otowi Bridge, NM (Natural Flows)

Rio Grande Basin

Rio Grande at Otowi Bridge, NM (Natural Flows)

Calibration & Validation

Long-term Reconstruction

Data File (text)

Data File (Excel)

Background

In November 2007, Connie Woodhouse, Jeff Lukas, and several colleagues held a workshop in Albuquerque, NM as the first stage of a NOAA-funded project to expand and improve the usability of tree-ring reconstructions for drought planning and water management in the Rio Grande basin. Based on feedback from workshop participants, including staff from the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission, Woodhouse, Lukas, and David Meko generated two reconstructions for the Rio Grande at Otowi gage. One is calibrated on gaged flows with adjustment by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) for the San Juan/Chama diversion and evaporation and storage effects of two reservoirs, and the other is calibrated primarily on the sum of 10 headwaters and tributary gages largely unimpacted by diversions and depletions (see this presentation for details). These two reconstructions, along with one for the Canadian River in the Arkansas River basin, were presented at a follow-up workshop in Albuquerque in May 2008.

Metadata

Observed Record

Location: Rio Grande at Otowi, NM
USGS Gage: 08313000

Source: David Meko

Adjustment: Major adjustment for depletions above gage in San Luis Valley; see Readme in Excel Data file for more details

Observed Flows

Period: 1958-2002

Mean flow:	1750 KAF
Median flow:	1698 KAF
Minimum:	606 KAF
Maximum:	3071 KAF

Reconstructed Flows

Period: 1450-2002

Mean flow:	1749 KAF
Median flow:	1814 KAF
Minimum:	247 KAF
Maximum:	3117 KAF

Calibration & Validation

Methods

Linear regression was used to calibrate the observed flow record with a single predictor, which was the simple average of 17 tree-ring chronologies from Colorado, northern New Mexico, and southeast Utah, that spanned the period 1450-2002. The residual chronologies, with the low-order autocorrelation removed, were used. Validation statistics were computed using a leave-one-out (cross-validation) approach.

Predictor: Mean of these 17 chronologies: Mesa Alta - pine (NM), Fenton Lake (NM), Beef Basin (UT), Navajo Canyon (CO), Lands End (CO), Wild Rose (CO), Princeton Douglas-fir (CO), McPhee-Dolores (CO), Sargents (CO), Unaweep (CO), Pump House (CO), Cathedral Creek (CO), Gould Reservoir (CO), Trail Gulch (CO), Montrose (CO), Slickrock (CO), Chokecherry Canyon (CO)

Statistic	Calibration	Validation
Explained variance (R2)	0.74
Reduction of Error (RE)		0.71
Standard Error of the Estimate	333,100 AF
Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)		337,200 AF

(For explanations of these statistics, see this document (PDF), and also the Reconstruction Case Study page.)

Figure 1. Scatter plot of observed and reconstructed Rio Grande annual flow, 1958-2002.

Figure 2. Observed (black) and reconstructed (blue) Rio Grande annual flow, 1958-2002. The observed mean is illustrated by the dashed line.

^ return to top of page

Long-Term Reconstruction

Figure 3. Reconstructed annual flow for the Rio Grande (1450-2002) is shown in blue. Observed flow is shown in gray and the long-term reconstructed mean is shown by the dashed line.

Figure 4. The 10-year running mean (plotted on final year) of reconstructed Rio Grande flow, 1450-2002. Reconstructed values are shown in blue and observed values are shown in gray. The long-term reconstructed mean is shown by the dashed line.

^ return to top of page

TreeFlow Home - Basin Data Access - Background Info - Applications - Workshops - Colo. River Paleo Perspective - Analysis Toolbox - Other Resources - About TreeFlow